|
Kurdish
Women Were Sold As Sex-Slaves to Egypt
22-03-2006
C.H.A.K
After
the fall of the Iraqi régime, we found this document in the main
seat of MOKABARAT,
Center
Halabja against Genocide and Anfalization of the Kurdish people
N°1601.
Date :
10.12.1989.
In
the name of God.
Secret
and fast.
From:
MOKABARAT Administration in
TAMIM.
To:
MOKABARAT General Administration.
When
we received the presidential order to put to execution the
operations ANFAL 1 and ANFAL 2, we stopped several groups of people.
One of these groups was constituted of girls from 14 to 29 years.
According to the presidential order, we sold some of them to the
Egyptians for their nightspots, because they needed prostitutes and
dancers. Here are their names and their ages:
|
|
|
|
NAME
Galawij
Adel Raym
|
AGE
12
|
|
Shiman
Nazim Abas
|
23
|
|
Layla
Abas Gouhar
|
21
|
|
Lmya
Nazim Homar
|
19
|
|
Bayman
Shekr Moustafa
|
16
|
|
Korasan
Abdela Tofik
|
20
|
|
Kadria
Ahmad Ibrahim
|
17
|
|
Golik
Ibrahim Ali
|
19
|
|
Gola
Ahmad Fakradin
|
25
|
|
Asmat
Kdir Aziz
|
24
|
|
Nagiba
Hsan Ali
|
18
|
|
Hasiba
Amin Hmza
|
29
|
|
Parwin
Hasan Ali
|
20
|
|
Brkaya
Rostm Mouhamad
|
27
|
|
Hasyba
Hydayat Ibrahim
|
15
|
|
Kustan
Abas maoulod
|
26
|
|
Sram
Osman Karam
|
17
|
|
Soza
Majid Bahm
|
29
|
MOKABARAT
Administration in Tamim,
20.12.1989.
To The
Universal General Opinion
Our requests
from Egypt State
Anfal
Operation process is the name these attacks which the Baath regime
carried out against the kurds nation in the southern of Kurdistan.
The operation began in 18/2/1988 and ended in
6/9/1988.
This
operation was carried out by eight stages. If we consider to the
ways of planning, appointing the people whom they were attacked from
the operation, the width of the action, human and material losses
and separating a certain kind of people and killing them …this
is genocide.
In
Anfal brutal attack 182.000 Kurdish human-being were buried alive,
their bones and bodies have not sent to their relatives. Thousands
of villages were destroyed and the remaining people were compulsory
migrated to the collect township. Life in these
compulsory collect
township is exactly the same as the life in military
township. Baath regime prevent living outside main roads between
cities.
In
the same process, eighteen Kurdish chaste girls were sent to
Egyptian prostitution houses, according to an Iraqi Intelligence
Agency. This is slavery by every measures.
We
often and formally asked Egypt State the fate of these eighteen
girls. Sorry, Egypt has chosen the silence and has not given us a
written answer. Egypt is afraid of written answer, merely told us an
oral denial.
Beside
that crime, Egypt helped the Baath regime by all kinds of gun,
especially the chemical weapons in strangling our nation. For this
reason Egypt is guilty by co partnership in genocide Kurd nation.
We
demand from Egypt State :
-
Describe
its attitude towards Anfal process and the fate of these eighteen
girls formally and by written.
-
Confess that all the actions had been done in the Anfal process and
chemical bombed against Kurd , which took part in them by normal
guns and forbbiden chemical weapons , are genocide.
-
Apologize to the Kurdish nation formally ,those were
bombed and killed by the guns Egypt had given to the Iraqi regime.
The
Centre of Halabja Against Anfalization and
Genocide of the Kurds
C.H.A.K
22/3/2006
Justice
for Grace!
Prosecute
the real criminal!
Remove
irresponsible government officials for their neglect!
Another
Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) fell victim to an abuse made worse by
Philippine government neglect.
Grace
(not her real name) was raped by an Emirati identified as Khalifa
Hassan Khalifa on May 16 in a desert area in Sharjah, UAE, 50 km
from Dubai. She was hospitalized for 10 days after which she pursued
the case against Khalifa. In a tragic twist however, she was the one
who was put in jail on May 26 on trumped up charges of Illicit
Relationship (Adultery), and Under the Influence of Alcohol.
Justice
should be served to the real criminal. The imprisonment of Grace is
an affront to justice, fairness, rights of women, and the rights of
migrant workers.
The
Philippine government officials in UAE are culpable to the crime as
the abductor and rapist of Grace.
She
was denied assistance to pursue her case that forced her to raise
the needed funds for her defense. Her lawyer did not even show up
during the hearing – conducted in Arabic – that made her admit
to charges she did not commit.
Not
a shadow of any official from the Philippine Embassy in UAE was seen
during the whole ordeal of Grace save for a single visit in jail of
Consul Renato P.O. Villa, Labor Attaché Vicente Cabe, and Social
Worker Delia Parani. The repeated requests for financial assistance
from the Philippine government were continuously denied.
We
are outraged by the statements of Labor Secretary Patricia Sto.
Tomas and Foreign Affairs Secretary Blas Ople who said that they
were aware of the case but chose not to publicize it to supposedly
“protect the victim and not to prejudice the case” because it is
a “matter of policy and simple decency.”
A
matter of policy is the protection that the Philippine government
should give to OFWs. Simple decency is for government officials to
own their faults and suffer the consequences of their neglect.
Grace’s
case exhibit a government wrought with neglect of their nationals
abroad. We see in her Gloria Giron-Lorio who was forcibly taken from
a Philippine government-run shelter in Hong Kong and killed only
meters away from the shelter. We see in her Flor Contemplacion from
Singapore whose execution, largely due to government inaction,
enraged the Filipinos worldwide.
We
see in her thousands more of OFWs who suffer abuses, unjustly
imprisoned, stranded in foreign countries, and victimized by human
rights violations.
If
the full justice is to be given to Grace, Philippine Embassy Charge
d' Affaires Generoso G. Calonge, Consul Villa, Labatt Cabe, Welfare
Officer Betty Walkington, Secretary Ople and Secretary Sto. Tomas
must resign from their posts due to gross neglect of their duties.
Grace
must be given full assistance for her release from prison. Her
abductor must be prosecuted and she must be given just compensation.
We
demand no less.
Please
return or mail back accomplished forms to:
MIGRANTE-Europe
(philippines),
Postbus
15687,
1001
ND Amsterdam /
The Netherlands
E-mail:
migrante-europe@zonnet.nl
+31(0)20-4284521;
+31(0)6-25300176;
+31(0)20
6165288;
+31(0)6-14659553
Woman
who marries to get rid of father beating, battered and put on street
by her husband
YASAR AKGUN
ISTANBUL (DIHA) - Leyla Sarigul, who married just for sake of
getting rid of father beating was beaten harshly and put on the
street with her 1 year old baby by her husband. Sarigul was provided
a haven house by IHD (Human Rights Association). "My father
used to constantly beat me but I will not let anyone lift hand
against my child and give the love nobody gave me" said
Sarigul.
The tragedy of women victims of violence once more came to the
agenda by Leyla Sari, who was put on the street with her not even
one year old baby. Leyla Sari had married just as a salvation from
the beatings of her father but she met husband battering a short
time after marriage. She attempted suicide in order to put an end to
her life full of male torture but she didn't die. Sarigul was lastly
put out on streets with her baby in her arms about one month ago.
Helpless and nowhere to go, she had lived in streets and parks.
Noticing her, two women gave a helping hand to her and applied to
IHD. IHD workers took her and her baby to a haven house.
'My father was beating us with special thick sticks'
Sarigul talked to DIHA and said she first met violence when his
father beat her mother. Claiming that her father even give her
electric shock Sarigul continued, "My father had a strange
drive for violence. I cannot remember those days. He had special
thick stick made for beating us".
'I got married but met husband beating'
Sarigul further said that she left home and started to work at
accounting department of a company and later married to Ibrahim
Sevim who worked at the same company.
"We had no problems for the first two months of marriage. After
a while I became pregnant. Everything turned upside down as my baby
was born. The baby was 2-3 months old when I learned that my husband
rented a separate house with another woman and began to live with
her. After that we were always quarrelling. Lastly, 2 months ago I
learned that he began to live with another woman. He didn't let me
in the house that night. When I went home the next day I was
shocked. Because he had sold all belongings and furnitures in the
house".
Took shelter at father's house but...
Sarigul says she forgave her husband after all, just for sake of
well being of her baby but he didn't hesitate a moment to put them
on streets.
"When I was put on the street I took shelter at my father
house, but he beat me brutally. I didn't worth a penny in his eyes
because I didn't have any money. He said, 'Get out of my house. Go
and do prostitution, go an die'. I prefer dying thousand times to
hear such insults. I was dismissed by my father, too. So we were
homeless again".
'No one will dare to raise his hand against my child'
Sarigul says she would begin a totally new life at the haven house
with her daughter named 'Hasret' which means 'longing'.
"My father always beat me but I will not let anyone touch my
daughter and give her the love I was not given by my parents.
Because I have a safe haven now. I will work and look after my
child. I will be both mother and father for her. I will do my best
to provide her better living conditions".
(yak/zd/ek) (22/4/2004 - 13:16) ©
DIHA, 2004
........................................................................................................
Attack against Kurdish women rights activist
On
14 June 2003 Gülbahar Gündüz, a board member from the
Women’s Section of the Democratic Peoples` Party DEHAP in Istanbul,
was arrested, tortured and raped by four plain clothed policemen.
Being arrested the policemen threatened her with the words: “Why
are you women playing a leading part in the Campaign for a General
Amnesty? You think that we won’t touch you on the streets, because
you are women. But this should be a lesson to all of you women!
Being
kidnapped in front of the DEHAP-building in Istanbul Gülbahar Gündüz
was blindfolded and beaten up till she became unconscious. As she
stated at a press conference, which was organised by the Human
Rights Association IHD yesterday: “When I came back to
conscience I found myself in a very hot room in the celery. There I
was interrogated, while my eyes were blindfolded and I was tortured.
They hit me with a very hard thing on my head. By using another
metallic thing they tore off the skin at my back and other parts of
my body. They extinguished cigarettes in my face and I raped me by
oral penetration. After 8 hours they put me in a car and dropped me
off on a highway near Gaziosmanpasha (…)”
As
it was made clear by the threats of the offenders, this attack
against Gülbahar Gündüz is at the same time an attack against all
women who are longing for peace and democracy.
In
hundreds of cases the Turkish State has not only been sentenced for
its human right abuses by the European Human Rights Court, but
international human rights organisations reported repeatedly on the
massacres and tortures, the policy of assimilation and
discrimination against the Kurdish people. In these days Turkish
government wants to add a further step to this policy by presenting
a new “Act of Remorse”, which aims at turning the victims of
state oppression into offenders. By organising themselves Kurdish
women have played a leading part in the struggle for peace,
democracy and justice in Turkey during the last years. This they
also carried on in the recent campaign for Social Peace and
Democratic Participation, which was started by a huge number of
civil organisations and NGOs opposing the “Act of Remorse”. As
the Turkish authorities also realized that women are the essential
strength of the democratisation process, they are aiming with
inhumane, sexist attacks at all women. We know; the torture and the
violence used by Turkish state forces against Gülbahar Gündüz are
a result of the patriarchal system, its mentality and institutions.
By these means they want to prevent women from speaking out,
developing their strength and free identity. They want to prevent
women from playing an active role in creating a democratic and
peaceful society.
The
patriarchal system can neither stand the political and social
engagement of women that aims on developing a new live in peace and
justice, nor respect women’s choice towards their own live.
So-called hour killings still punish behaviours or relationships
that do not fit into the restrictive and conservative religious
pattern, and they are directly or indirectly supported by the state
and its law. Not only in Nigeria, but also in Kurdistan and Turkey
women are still confronted with this reality. Only 6 days ago Semse
Allak died in Diyarbakir Hospital due to the stoning
punishment carried out by her own relatives 7 month earlier. She had
been found “guilty” of crossing the boarders of the religious
construction of “honour”. Therefore she had to die.
(Sources: mha - mezopotamya news agency;
Özgür Politika )
Is
women's struggle for peace and democracy truly that much of a
threat?
Impressions
from a member of the international
women's delegation
to Istanbul 26/06 - 01/07/2003
The
army, the police, the secret services and the numerous political
parties in Turkey are bound to answer 'yes' to that question. They
do pose a threat, because there are so many of them. They build
networks and join forces in close co-operation and support. And even
if we arrest them, and torture or even rape them, they will not be
silenced.
I did not pose this question,
because in effect I already knew the answer. The Turkish state
blocks each and every process intended to bring about peace,
democracy and human rights. It makes feints to remain on friendly
terms with the European countries and the USA. Laws are modified a
little and big words are spoken. But at the same time, there is no
lessening of either repression or state terror. It is just that the
state exercises a little more caution. Kidnapping, placing a bag
over the victims' head, torturing them and eventually dumping them
in the middle of nowhere is a tried and tested tactic. The victim
has no idea who attacked him, nor where. Which makes it very
difficult to take matters to court. Threats and intimidation on the
phone are another. Very frightening, but hard to put a stop to. And
lately, a third way of imposing high fines has become a popular
method. Can't pay? Then prison awaits. Imposing fines is mild
punishment, is it not, EU? But the effect is the same. It disrupts
organisations as the victims are, for a time at least, unable to
perform their jobs. Also, murders by unknown perpetrators are on the
increase. This was a well-known method in the 1990s.
It stands to reason that
people are asking questions or taking to the streets. It is
encouraging that women too are getting more and more organised to
actively promote change. In the
past, they were all too often reduced to 'nameless, faceless
victims'.
However, it is equally
important that Kurds and Turks join forces in their campaign for
social peace. In fact, it's a dire necessity!
In Turkey, anyone belonging to the democratic
opposition has always run the risk of being arrested, threatened,
put in prison, tortured, of disappearing or even being murdered. I
myself am not convinced this has suddenly changed. Especially when I
read and hear the stories from women's organisations, and civil and
human rights groups both in and outside of Turkey.
I also know that the repression of the Kurds has not
abated. On the contrary. Of late, the situation seems to have taken
a turn for the worst. In my view, the situation has been brought to
a head once again with the preparations for war in Iraq by the USA
and the UK. The Turkish state immediately set itself up to form a
buffer in the north of Iraq. The Turkish authorities and the Turkish
army still fear that a possible regime change could affect the
position of the Kurds in their neighbouring country. Which in turn
might have repercussions on the Kurds living in Turkey. Well, they
might have a point…
For several decennia, the Kurds in Turkey have fought
for recognition, rights and respect. Many have risked their necks in
this struggle and paid for it with their freedom or their lives.
Several civil and political organisations labouring for this cause
were banned. The PKK opted to continue the struggle by different
means. But the cease-fires - the last one dating from 1999 - did not
lead to any tangible results. No attempts at conciliation were made
by the Turkish state. Is Turkey really willing to risk KADEK taking
up the armed struggle once again? Is that truly what they want? It
appears so.
And what stance do the surrounding countries, the EU, the US and
NATO take? They sit around and watch… And worse! They seem to be
offering direct and indirect support. Turkey's presence in the north
of Iraq is condoned; apparently it is once again okay for the
Turkish army to actively commit murders in Turkey's Kurdish
territories; the Turkish state is not even slapped on the wrist for
exercising terror against women peacefully campaigning for social
peace.
To date, the Dutch media seem to have paid very little attention to
the campaigns of the various women's organisations in Turkey. No
Dutch MP has as yet brought up in Parliament the events in Turkey
and the violence against women, more specifically against Gulbahar
Gunduz. And no politician in the Dutch Parliament has thus far taken
a position on DEHAP's offer to mediate between KADEK and the Turkish
state.
I joined the international women's delegation partly
out of helpless indignation. But at the same time I felt motivated
by an enormous respect and sympathy for Kurdish and Turkish women.
From a position of virtual invisibility, they have managed to become
a formidable force. Over the past years, they established several
organisations, each in their own way contributing to the struggle
against patriarchal oppression and other forms of repression. Many
organisations have found each other in the struggle for human
rights, social stability and democracy.
Our encounters with Gulbahar Gunduz, DEHAP's Women's
Movement, Armagi, 'The Rainbow' Women's Centre, lawyer Fatma
Karatas, Mothers for Peace and the IHD made a profound impression on
me. They spoke about their aims, their actions and their plans with
great frankness. They shared with us their experiences and the
problems they encountered. None of them doubted the justice of the
women's struggle and the campaign for social peace. The various
organisations and individuals may express different motivations,
their mutual support is boundless.
The international women's delegation presented
Gulbahar with a letter of support and a gift from the International
Free Women's Foundation.
We also presented her with a booklet, composed by CENI,
the Kurdish Women's Agency for Peace, which is situated in Germany.
This contained several declarations of support from women's
organisations from various countries, as well as from the well-known
media critic Noam Chomsky.
We informed various Dutch political
parties, individual politicians in Germany and several state
departments in Austria about the situation and our presence in
Istanbul by fax. We personally met with the Dutch consul and a
representative of the German consulate.
Back in Europe, we try to give voice
to the women's struggle by getting in touch with the media, with
politicians and interested parties.
To express my international
solidarity, this is the least I, as a woman, can do.
July 2003
Andrea Sturkenboom,
Dutch member of the international women's delegation,
on behalf of the International Free Women's Movement and the Maxmur
Committee 26/06 - 01/07/2003 in Istanbul
Safe
Women`s Lives!
Human rights organisations and
women initiatives have started an international campaign, in order
to safe the lives of Negerian women, who are threatened by being
stoned to death. It is important to take immediate action. The
following article and call for action was published by
amnesty international:
Several Northern States in
Nigeria have introduced new Sharia Penal Legislation. Thus, they
opened the door for the application of death sentences, torture and
other cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments. This despite the
fact that Nigeria recognises human rights standards and has signed
and ratified many international human rights legal instruments. Join
the campaign to spare dozens of people in Nigeria from being victims
of human rights violations under the new legislation:
|
Amina
Lawal © BBC
|
|
|
AMINA LAWAL, a
30 year-old Muslim woman, was sentenced on Friday 22 March 2002 to
stoning to death by a Shari'ah court at Bakori in Katsina State in
northern Nigeria. Amina allegedly confessed to having had a child
while divorced. Pregnancy outside of marriage constitutes sufficient
evidence for a woman to be convicted of adultery according to the
new Shari'ah-based penal code for Muslims, introduced in Katsina
State.
The man named as the father of her baby girl reportedly denied
having sex with her and his confession was enough for the charges
against him to be discontinued. Amina did not have a lawyer during
her first trial, when the judgement was passed. But she has now
filed an appeal against her sentence with the help of a lawyer hired
by a pool of Nigerian human rights and women's rights organisations.
Amina is awating trial at home. The Shari'ah Court of Appeal of
Funtua, Katsina State, set 27 May as the date for the hearing of
Amina's appeal against her sentence to death by stoning.
The first hearing of the appeal was scheduled for 27 May 2002, but
adjourned twice, first to 3 June 2002 and then to 8 July 2002 after
Amina Lawal's lawyer argued for an early hearing to take place
instead of having the hearing postponed until next year as
previously proposed by the court. Amina Lawal is still weaning her
baby. Such a long adjournment of the case would have not served any
useful purpose and would have deepened the climate of uncertainty
created by the whole process. The terms of the bail have also been
reviewed. Under these new terms for bail agreed by the court, Amina
Lawal will no longer be reporting fortnightly to them. The only
condition, however, is that Amina Lawal had to have a 'surety'.
Update :
On 19 August 2002, a Sharia court of appeal in Funtua took the
decision to uphold the sentence of death by stoning imposed on Amina
Lawal. This confirmation of the sentence has shocked the civil
society in and outside Nigeria, especially all those who have been
actively campaigning for Amina's rights to be protected. Amnesty
International has expressed its concerned at this latest development
in a Press release issued on 19 August 2002 which title is Nigeria:
Death by stoning upheld in the case of Amina Lawal.
Amina Lawal was granted 30 days to appeal against the decision.
Amina's lawyer has now filed another appeal to be certainly heard at
the Upper Sharia court of appeal in Katsina. The court will have to
now acknowledge receipt of the new request for appeal and decide a
date for the hearing of the next appeal. The line of action should
be the same:
- Please write
to Nigerian authorities
(to both Nigerian diplomatic representatives in your country and
government authorities in Nigeria) and reiterate AI's concerns
about the decision of the court to uphold the sentence to death
on Amina Lawal.
- Please use the sample letter
given below to illustrate the case of Amina Lawal.
YUNUSA RAFIN CHIYAWA, a
farmer from Bauchi State, became on 21 June 2002 the first man to be
sentenced by a Sharia Court in northern Nigeria to stoning to death
for adultery, as he reportedly confessed to have had sexual
relations with a married woman in the village of Alkaleri. Yunusa
was denounced by a friend for allegedly taking his wife from their
home to an unknown destination for 14 days and having sex with her.
The Sharia Court of Ningi considered Yunusa's confession as
sufficient evidence to sentence him to death by stoning. The woman
was freed as she swore before the Sharia Court that the convict had
put a spell on her. According to the judge, this confession leads to
consider that the woman suffered temporary madness during the sexual
relations with Yunusa Rafin, and therefore she is not subject to
punishment. Yunusa Rafin Chiyawa was given 30 days to appeal against
the sentence. According to reports, Yunusa Rafin Chiyawa did not
have legal representation during the trial and expressed no
intention to appeal against the sentence. He was released to await
the verdict to be carried out.
UPDATE: The Office of the Commissioner of Justice of Bauchi
State has filed a case to the State Council to apply for an
appearance on behalf of the State in Chiyawa's case, based on the
fact that the case involves a capital offence. Thus, the State
Government is requesting to take the case to the High Court of the
State and remove it for the Sharia Penal jurisdiction. The Council
of Sharia of Bauchi State opposes the case to be withdrawn from the
Sharia jurisdiction. Adultery does not attract death penalty in the
Penal Code of Northern Nigeria, applied in the Magistrates' courts
of the north of the country. Amnesty International has no
confirmation that this conflict of jurisdiction has put the process
against Chiyawa on hold; therefore, our organisation fears that
there might still be a risk of Chiyawa being executed.
GARBA DANDARE was convicted and sentenced to the amputation
of the right wrist and the left foot from the ankle by the Upper
Shari'ah Court II, Sokoto for alleged robbery (Hiraba). An appeal
was filed against the sentence before the Shari'ah Court of Appeal
of Sokoto. The record of proceedings of the trial court is still
under compilation.
ABUBAKAR ALIYU, a 15 year old boy was reportedly sentenced to
amputation by a Birnin-Kebbi State Upper Shari'ah Court in April
2002 for stealing the equivalent to US$ 280. The verdict sentence
has been put before the state Shari'ah implementation Committee for
ratification and which will in turn, send its recommendations to the
State Executive Council for a final approval before the sentence is
carried out. Abubakar has the right to appeal against the judgement
in the Shari'ah appeal court of Birnin-Kebbi.
IBRAHIMA BARIYA MAGAZU, AMINA LAWAL, YUNUSA RAFIN
CHIYAWA, SAFIYA HUSSAINI, HARUNA BAYERO, GARBA DANDARE,
ABUBAKAR ALIYU and many more who have been condemned under
the new Shari'ah based penal codes are being discriminated against
on grounds of their religion: these new codes only apply to Muslims
in a multi-religious country like Nigeria. They are also being
discriminated against on grounds of their social status, as they all
come from deprived backgrounds. Ibrahima, Amina and Safiya have also
been discriminated against just for being women since the men
involved in each one of these cases have walked free from the
courts...
Take Action
Please write now to the President of Nigeria and the Minister of
Justice asking for the supression
of the death penalty and cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment
at every level of the Nigerian legislation.
His Excellency Olusegun Obasanjo,
President of the Republic,
The Presidency,
Federal Secretariat,
Phase II, Shehu Shagari Way,
Abuja;
Fax: 234 9 523 21 36 (press office)
His Excellency Kanu Godwin Agabi,
Minister of Justice, Ministry of Justice,
New Federal Secretariat complex Shehu Shagari Way,
Abuja,
Federal Capital Territory,
Nigeria;
Fax: 234 9 523 52 08.
email:webmaster@nigeria.gov.ng
back...
|