Violence against women

 

                 

Kurdish Women Were Sold As Sex-Slaves to Egypt

22-03-2006 C.H.A.K

After the fall of the Iraqi régime, we found this document in the main seat of MOKABARAT,

Center Halabja against Genocide and Anfalization of the Kurdish people


N°1601.

Date : 10.12.1989.

In the name of God.

Secret and fast. 

From: MOKABARAT Administration in TAMIM.

To: MOKABARAT General Administration.

When we received the presidential order to put to execution the operations ANFAL 1 and ANFAL 2, we stopped several groups of people. One of these groups was constituted of girls from 14 to 29 years. According to the presidential order, we sold some of them to the Egyptians for their nightspots, because they needed prostitutes and dancers. Here are their names and their ages:

 

 

NAME

Galawij Adel Raym

AGE

12

Shiman Nazim Abas

23

Layla Abas Gouhar

21

Lmya Nazim Homar

19

Bayman Shekr Moustafa 

16

Korasan Abdela Tofik

20

Kadria Ahmad Ibrahim

17

Golik Ibrahim Ali

19

Gola Ahmad Fakradin

25

Asmat Kdir Aziz

24

Nagiba Hsan Ali

18

Hasiba Amin Hmza

29

Parwin Hasan Ali

20

Brkaya  Rostm Mouhamad

27

Hasyba Hydayat Ibrahim

15

Kustan Abas maoulod

26

Sram Osman Karam

17

Soza Majid Bahm

29

MOKABARAT Administration in Tamim,

20.12.1989.



To The Universal General Opinion

Our requests from Egypt State

Anfal Operation process is the name these attacks which the Baath regime carried out against the kurds nation in the southern of Kurdistan. The operation began in 18/2/1988 and ended in  6/9/1988.

This operation was carried out by eight stages. If we consider to the ways of planning, appointing the people whom they were attacked from the operation, the width of the action, human and material losses and separating a certain kind of people and killing them …this is  genocide.

In Anfal brutal attack 182.000 Kurdish human-being were buried alive, their bones and bodies have not sent to their relatives. Thousands of villages were destroyed and the remaining people were compulsory migrated to the collect township. Life in these  compulsory  collect  township is exactly the same as the life in military township. Baath regime prevent living outside main roads between cities.

In the same process, eighteen Kurdish chaste girls were sent to Egyptian prostitution houses, according to an Iraqi Intelligence Agency. This is slavery by every measures.

We often and formally asked Egypt State the fate of these eighteen girls. Sorry, Egypt has chosen the silence and has not given us a written answer. Egypt is afraid of written answer, merely told us an oral denial.

Beside that crime, Egypt helped the Baath regime by all kinds of gun, especially the chemical weapons in strangling our nation. For this reason Egypt is guilty by co partnership in genocide Kurd nation.

We demand from Egypt State :

-   Describe its attitude towards Anfal process and the fate of these eighteen girls formally and by written.

-   Confess that all the actions had been done in the Anfal process and chemical bombed against Kurd , which took part in them by normal guns and forbbiden chemical weapons , are genocide.

-   Apologize to the  Kurdish nation formally ,those were bombed and killed by the guns Egypt had given to the Iraqi regime.  

 

The Centre of Halabja Against Anfalization and Genocide of the Kurds 

C.H.A.K 22/3/2006

 


Justice for Grace! Prosecute the real criminal!

Remove irresponsible government officials for their neglect!

Another Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) fell victim to an abuse made worse by Philippine government neglect.

Grace (not her real name) was raped by an Emirati identified as Khalifa Hassan Khalifa on May 16 in a desert area in Sharjah, UAE, 50 km from Dubai. She was hospitalized for 10 days after which she pursued the case against Khalifa. In a tragic twist however, she was the one who was put in jail on May 26 on trumped up charges of Illicit Relationship (Adultery), and Under the Influence of Alcohol.

Justice should be served to the real criminal. The imprisonment of Grace is an affront to justice, fairness, rights of women, and the rights of migrant workers.

The Philippine government officials in UAE are culpable to the crime as the abductor and rapist of Grace.  

She was denied assistance to pursue her case that forced her to raise the needed funds for her defense. Her lawyer did not even show up during the hearing – conducted in Arabic – that made her admit to charges she did not commit. Not a shadow of any official from the Philippine Embassy in UAE was seen during the whole ordeal of Grace save for a single visit in jail of Consul Renato P.O. Villa, Labor Attaché Vicente Cabe, and Social Worker Delia Parani. The repeated requests for financial assistance from the Philippine government were continuously denied.

We are outraged by the statements of Labor Secretary Patricia Sto. Tomas and Foreign Affairs Secretary Blas Ople who said that they were aware of the case but chose not to publicize it to supposedly “protect the victim and not to prejudice the case” because it is a “matter of policy and simple decency.” A matter of policy is the protection that the Philippine government should give to OFWs. Simple decency is for government officials to own their faults and suffer the consequences of their neglect. Grace’s case exhibit a government wrought with neglect of their nationals abroad. We see in her Gloria Giron-Lorio who was forcibly taken from a Philippine government-run shelter in Hong Kong and killed only meters away from the shelter. We see in her Flor Contemplacion from Singapore whose execution, largely due to government inaction, enraged the Filipinos worldwide.

We see in her thousands more of OFWs who suffer abuses, unjustly imprisoned, stranded in foreign countries, and victimized by human rights violations. If the full justice is to be given to Grace, Philippine Embassy Charge d' Affaires Generoso G. Calonge, Consul Villa, Labatt Cabe, Welfare Officer Betty Walkington, Secretary Ople and Secretary Sto. Tomas must resign from their posts due to gross neglect of their duties.

Grace must be given full assistance for her release from prison. Her abductor must be prosecuted and she must be given just compensation.

We demand no less.

Please return or mail back accomplished forms to:   
MIGRANTE-Europe (philippines),
 
Postbus 15687, 
1001 ND Amsterdam /
The Netherlands
E-mail: migrante-europe@zonnet.nl

+31(0)20-4284521; +31(0)6-25300176; +31(0)20 6165288; +31(0)6-14659553


Woman who marries to get rid of father beating, battered and put on street by her husband

YASAR AKGUN

ISTANBUL (DIHA) - Leyla Sarigul, who married just for sake of getting rid of father beating was beaten harshly and put on the street with her 1 year old baby by her husband. Sarigul was provided a haven house by IHD (Human Rights Association). "My father used to constantly beat me but I will not let anyone lift hand against my child and give the love nobody gave me" said Sarigul.

The tragedy of women victims of violence once more came to the agenda by Leyla Sari, who was put on the street with her not even one year old baby. Leyla Sari had married just as a salvation from the beatings of her father but she met husband battering a short time after marriage. She attempted suicide in order to put an end to her life full of male torture but she didn't die. Sarigul was lastly put out on streets with her baby in her arms about one month ago. Helpless and nowhere to go, she had lived in streets and parks. Noticing her, two women gave a helping hand to her and applied to IHD. IHD workers took her and her baby to a haven house.

'My father was beating us with special thick sticks'

Sarigul talked to DIHA and said she first met violence when his father beat her mother. Claiming that her father even give her electric shock Sarigul continued, "My father had a strange drive for violence. I cannot remember those days. He had special thick stick made for beating us".

'I got married but met husband beating'

Sarigul further said that she left home and started to work at accounting department of a company and later married to Ibrahim Sevim who worked at the same company.

"We had no problems for the first two months of marriage. After a while I became pregnant. Everything turned upside down as my baby was born. The baby was 2-3 months old when I learned that my husband rented a separate house with another woman and began to live with her. After that we were always quarrelling. Lastly, 2 months ago I learned that he began to live with another woman. He didn't let me in the house that night. When I went home the next day I was shocked. Because he had sold all belongings and furnitures in the house".

Took shelter at father's house but...

Sarigul says she forgave her husband after all, just for sake of well being of her baby but he didn't hesitate a moment to put them on streets.

"When I was put on the street I took shelter at my father house, but he beat me brutally. I didn't worth a penny in his eyes because I didn't have any money. He said, 'Get out of my house. Go and do prostitution, go an die'. I prefer dying thousand times to hear such insults. I was dismissed by my father, too. So we were homeless again".

'No one will dare to raise his hand against my child'

Sarigul says she would begin a totally new life at the haven house with her daughter named 'Hasret' which means 'longing'.

"My father always beat me but I will not let anyone touch my daughter and give her the love I was not given by my parents. Because I have a safe haven now. I will work and look after my child. I will be both mother and father for her. I will do my best to provide her better living conditions".

(yak/zd/ek) (22/4/2004 - 13:16) © DIHA, 2004

 

........................................................................................................

Attack against Kurdish women rights activist

On 14 June 2003 Gülbahar Gündüz, a board member from the Women’s Section of the Democratic Peoples` Party DEHAP in Istanbul, was arrested, tortured and raped by four plain clothed policemen. Being arrested the policemen threatened her with the words: “Why are you women playing a leading part in the Campaign for a General Amnesty? You think that we won’t touch you on the streets, because you are women. But this should be a lesson to all of you women!

Being kidnapped in front of the DEHAP-building in Istanbul Gülbahar Gündüz was blindfolded and beaten up till she became unconscious. As she stated at a press conference, which was organised by the Human Rights Association IHD yesterday: “When I came back to conscience I found myself in a very hot room in the celery. There I was interrogated, while my eyes were blindfolded and I was tortured. They hit me with a very hard thing on my head. By using another metallic thing they tore off the skin at my back and other parts of my body. They extinguished cigarettes in my face and I raped me by oral penetration. After 8 hours they put me in a car and dropped me off on a highway near Gaziosmanpasha (…)” 

   

As it was made clear by the threats of the offenders, this attack against Gülbahar Gündüz is at the same time an attack against all women who are longing for peace and democracy.

In hundreds of cases the Turkish State has not only been sentenced for its human right abuses by the European Human Rights Court, but international human rights organisations reported repeatedly on the massacres and tortures, the policy of assimilation and discrimination against the Kurdish people. In these days Turkish government wants to add a further step to this policy by presenting a new “Act of Remorse”, which aims at turning the victims of state oppression into offenders. By organising themselves Kurdish women have played a leading part in the struggle for peace, democracy and justice in Turkey during the last years. This they also carried on in the recent campaign for Social Peace and Democratic Participation, which was started by a huge number of civil organisations and NGOs opposing the “Act of Remorse”. As the Turkish authorities also realized that women are the essential strength of the democratisation process, they are aiming with inhumane, sexist attacks at all women. We know; the torture and the violence used by Turkish state forces against Gülbahar Gündüz are a result of the patriarchal system, its mentality and institutions. By these means they want to prevent women from speaking out, developing their strength and free identity. They want to prevent women from playing an active role in creating a democratic and peaceful society.

The patriarchal system can neither stand the political and social engagement of women that aims on developing a new live in peace and justice, nor respect women’s choice towards their own live. So-called hour killings still punish behaviours or relationships that do not fit into the restrictive and conservative religious pattern, and they are directly or indirectly supported by the state and its law. Not only in Nigeria, but also in Kurdistan and Turkey women are still confronted with this reality. Only 6 days ago Semse Allak died in Diyarbakir Hospital due to the stoning punishment carried out by her own relatives 7 month earlier. She had been found “guilty” of crossing the boarders of the religious construction of “honour”. Therefore she had to die.

(Sources: mha - mezopotamya news agency; Özgür Politika )


Is women's struggle for peace and democracy truly that much of a threat?

Impressions from a member of the international women's delegation
to Istanbul 26/06 - 01/07/2003

The army, the police, the secret services and the numerous political parties in Turkey are bound to answer 'yes' to that question. They do pose a threat, because there are so many of them. They build networks and join forces in close co-operation and support. And even if we arrest them, and torture or even rape them, they will not be silenced. 

I did not pose this question, because in effect I already knew the answer. The Turkish state blocks each and every process intended to bring about peace, democracy and human rights. It makes feints to remain on friendly terms with the European countries and the USA. Laws are modified a little and big words are spoken. But at the same time, there is no lessening of either repression or state terror. It is just that the state exercises a little more caution. Kidnapping, placing a bag over the victims' head, torturing them and eventually dumping them in the middle of nowhere is a tried and tested tactic. The victim has no idea who attacked him, nor where. Which makes it very difficult to take matters to court. Threats and intimidation on the phone are another. Very frightening, but hard to put a stop to. And lately, a third way of imposing high fines has become a popular method. Can't pay? Then prison awaits. Imposing fines is mild punishment, is it not, EU? But the effect is the same. It disrupts organisations as the victims are, for a time at least, unable to perform their jobs. Also, murders by unknown perpetrators are on the increase. This was a well-known method in the 1990s. 

It stands to reason that people are asking questions or taking to the streets. It is encouraging that women too are getting more and more organised to actively promote change. In  the past, they were all too often reduced to 'nameless, faceless victims'.

However, it is equally important that Kurds and Turks join forces in their campaign for social peace. In fact, it's a dire necessity!

In Turkey, anyone belonging to the democratic opposition has always run the risk of being arrested, threatened, put in prison, tortured, of disappearing or even being murdered. I myself am not convinced this has suddenly changed. Especially when I read and hear the stories from women's organisations, and civil and human rights groups both in and outside of Turkey.

I also know that the repression of the Kurds has not abated. On the contrary. Of late, the situation seems to have taken a turn for the worst. In my view, the situation has been brought to a head once again with the preparations for war in Iraq by the USA and the UK. The Turkish state immediately set itself up to form a buffer in the north of Iraq. The Turkish authorities and the Turkish army still fear that a possible regime change could affect the position of the Kurds in their neighbouring country. Which in turn might have repercussions on the Kurds living in Turkey. Well, they might have a point…

For several decennia, the Kurds in Turkey have fought for recognition, rights and respect. Many have risked their necks in this struggle and paid for it with their freedom or their lives. Several civil and political organisations labouring for this cause were banned. The PKK opted to continue the struggle by different means. But the cease-fires - the last one dating from 1999 - did not lead to any tangible results. No attempts at conciliation were made by the Turkish state. Is Turkey really willing to risk KADEK taking up the armed struggle once again? Is that truly what they want? It appears so.
And what stance do the surrounding countries, the EU, the US and NATO take? They sit around and watch… And worse! They seem to be offering direct and indirect support. Turkey's presence in the north of Iraq is condoned; apparently it is once again okay for the Turkish army to actively commit murders in Turkey's Kurdish territories; the Turkish state is not even slapped on the wrist for exercising terror against women peacefully campaigning for social peace.
To date, the Dutch media seem to have paid very little attention to the campaigns of the various women's organisations in Turkey. No Dutch MP has as yet brought up in Parliament the events in Turkey and the violence against women, more specifically against Gulbahar Gunduz. And no politician in the Dutch Parliament has thus far taken a position on DEHAP's offer to mediate between KADEK and the Turkish state.

I joined the international women's delegation partly out of helpless indignation. But at the same time I felt motivated by an enormous respect and sympathy for Kurdish and Turkish women. From a position of virtual invisibility, they have managed to become a formidable force. Over the past years, they established several organisations, each in their own way contributing to the struggle against patriarchal oppression and other forms of repression. Many organisations have found each other in the struggle for human rights, social stability and democracy.

Our encounters with Gulbahar Gunduz, DEHAP's Women's Movement, Armagi, 'The Rainbow' Women's Centre, lawyer Fatma Karatas, Mothers for Peace and the IHD made a profound impression on me. They spoke about their aims, their actions and their plans with great frankness. They shared with us their experiences and the problems they encountered. None of them doubted the justice of the women's struggle and the campaign for social peace. The various organisations and individuals may express different motivations, their mutual support is boundless.

The international women's delegation presented Gulbahar with a letter of support and a gift from the International Free Women's Foundation. We also presented her with a booklet, composed by CENI, the Kurdish Women's Agency for Peace, which is situated in Germany. This contained several declarations of support from women's organisations from various countries, as well as from the well-known media critic Noam Chomsky.

We informed various Dutch political parties, individual politicians in Germany and several state departments in Austria about the situation and our presence in Istanbul by fax. We personally met with the Dutch consul and a representative of the German consulate.

Back in Europe, we try to give voice to the women's struggle by getting in touch with the media, with politicians and interested parties.

To express my international solidarity, this is the least I, as a woman, can do.

July 2003

Andrea Sturkenboom,
Dutch member of the international women's delegation, on behalf of the International Free Women's Movement and the Maxmur Committee 26/06 - 01/07/2003 in Istanbul

 


 

Safe Women`s Lives!

Human rights organisations and women initiatives have started an international campaign, in order to safe the lives of Negerian women, who are threatened by being stoned to death. It is important to take immediate action. The following article and call for action was published by amnesty international:

Several Northern States in Nigeria have introduced new Sharia Penal Legislation. Thus, they opened the door for the application of death sentences, torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading punishments. This despite the fact that Nigeria recognises human rights standards and has signed and ratified many international human rights legal instruments. Join the campaign to spare dozens of people in Nigeria from being victims of human rights violations under the new legislation:

Amina Lawal © BBC

 


AMINA LAWAL, a 30 year-old Muslim woman, was sentenced on Friday 22 March 2002 to stoning to death by a Shari'ah court at Bakori in Katsina State in northern Nigeria. Amina allegedly confessed to having had a child while divorced. Pregnancy outside of marriage constitutes sufficient evidence for a woman to be convicted of adultery according to the new Shari'ah-based penal code for Muslims, introduced in Katsina State.

The man named as the father of her baby girl reportedly denied having sex with her and his confession was enough for the charges against him to be discontinued. Amina did not have a lawyer during her first trial, when the judgement was passed. But she has now filed an appeal against her sentence with the help of a lawyer hired by a pool of Nigerian human rights and women's rights organisations. Amina is awating trial at home. The Shari'ah Court of Appeal of Funtua, Katsina State, set 27 May as the date for the hearing of Amina's appeal against her sentence to death by stoning.

The first hearing of the appeal was scheduled for 27 May 2002, but adjourned twice, first to 3 June 2002 and then to 8 July 2002 after Amina Lawal's lawyer argued for an early hearing to take place instead of having the hearing postponed until next year as previously proposed by the court. Amina Lawal is still weaning her baby. Such a long adjournment of the case would have not served any useful purpose and would have deepened the climate of uncertainty created by the whole process. The terms of the bail have also been reviewed. Under these new terms for bail agreed by the court, Amina Lawal will no longer be reporting fortnightly to them. The only condition, however, is that Amina Lawal had to have a 'surety'.

Update :
On 19 August 2002, a Sharia court of appeal in Funtua took the decision to uphold the sentence of death by stoning imposed on Amina Lawal. This confirmation of the sentence has shocked the civil society in and outside Nigeria, especially all those who have been actively campaigning for Amina's rights to be protected. Amnesty International has expressed its concerned at this latest development in a Press release issued on 19 August 2002 which title is Nigeria: Death by stoning upheld in the case of Amina Lawal.

Amina Lawal was granted 30 days to appeal against the decision. Amina's lawyer has now filed another appeal to be certainly heard at the Upper Sharia court of appeal in Katsina. The court will have to now acknowledge receipt of the new request for appeal and decide a date for the hearing of the next appeal. The line of action should be the same:

  • Please write to Nigerian authorities (to both Nigerian diplomatic representatives in your country and government authorities in Nigeria) and reiterate AI's concerns about the decision of the court to uphold the sentence to death on Amina Lawal.
  • Please use the sample letter given below to illustrate the case of Amina Lawal.
YUNUSA RAFIN CHIYAWA, a farmer from Bauchi State, became on 21 June 2002 the first man to be sentenced by a Sharia Court in northern Nigeria to stoning to death for adultery, as he reportedly confessed to have had sexual relations with a married woman in the village of Alkaleri. Yunusa was denounced by a friend for allegedly taking his wife from their home to an unknown destination for 14 days and having sex with her. The Sharia Court of Ningi considered Yunusa's confession as sufficient evidence to sentence him to death by stoning. The woman was freed as she swore before the Sharia Court that the convict had put a spell on her. According to the judge, this confession leads to consider that the woman suffered temporary madness during the sexual relations with Yunusa Rafin, and therefore she is not subject to punishment. Yunusa Rafin Chiyawa was given 30 days to appeal against the sentence. According to reports, Yunusa Rafin Chiyawa did not have legal representation during the trial and expressed no intention to appeal against the sentence. He was released to await the verdict to be carried out.

UPDATE: The Office of the Commissioner of Justice of Bauchi State has filed a case to the State Council to apply for an appearance on behalf of the State in Chiyawa's case, based on the fact that the case involves a capital offence. Thus, the State Government is requesting to take the case to the High Court of the State and remove it for the Sharia Penal jurisdiction. The Council of Sharia of Bauchi State opposes the case to be withdrawn from the Sharia jurisdiction. Adultery does not attract death penalty in the Penal Code of Northern Nigeria, applied in the Magistrates' courts of the north of the country. Amnesty International has no confirmation that this conflict of jurisdiction has put the process against Chiyawa on hold; therefore, our organisation fears that there might still be a risk of Chiyawa being executed.

GARBA DANDARE was convicted and sentenced to the amputation of the right wrist and the left foot from the ankle by the Upper Shari'ah Court II, Sokoto for alleged robbery (Hiraba). An appeal was filed against the sentence before the Shari'ah Court of Appeal of Sokoto. The record of proceedings of the trial court is still under compilation.

ABUBAKAR ALIYU, a 15 year old boy was reportedly sentenced to amputation by a Birnin-Kebbi State Upper Shari'ah Court in April 2002 for stealing the equivalent to US$ 280. The verdict sentence has been put before the state Shari'ah implementation Committee for ratification and which will in turn, send its recommendations to the State Executive Council for a final approval before the sentence is carried out. Abubakar has the right to appeal against the judgement in the Shari'ah appeal court of Birnin-Kebbi.

IBRAHIMA BARIYA MAGAZU, AMINA LAWAL, YUNUSA RAFIN CHIYAWA, SAFIYA HUSSAINI, HARUNA BAYERO, GARBA DANDARE, ABUBAKAR ALIYU and many more who have been condemned under the new Shari'ah based penal codes are being discriminated against on grounds of their religion: these new codes only apply to Muslims in a multi-religious country like Nigeria. They are also being discriminated against on grounds of their social status, as they all come from deprived backgrounds. Ibrahima, Amina and Safiya have also been discriminated against just for being women since the men involved in each one of these cases have walked free from the courts...


Take Action

Please write now to the President of Nigeria and the Minister of Justice asking for the supression
of the death penalty and cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment at every level of the Nigerian legislation.

His Excellency Olusegun Obasanjo,
President of the Republic,
The Presidency,
Federal Secretariat,
Phase II, Shehu Shagari Way,
Abuja;
Fax: 234 9 523 21 36 (press office)


His Excellency Kanu Godwin Agabi,
Minister of Justice, Ministry of Justice,
New Federal Secretariat complex Shehu Shagari Way,
Abuja,
Federal Capital Territory,
Nigeria;
Fax: 234 9 523 52 08.
email:webmaster@nigeria.gov.ng

back...